Weeklyletter.com

You haven't logged in yet  Log in  
Or register as a user. It's free.
Cut Costs, Not Business
by Paul Gibson

Home >> Cut Costs, Not Business

Posted by Paul Gibson
Businesses that are going bankrupt, workers laid off or made redundant by the thousands, payrolls that never arrive, bank accounts that disappear out of fear. These are the signs of the times. However, companies need to be smart when it comes to crisis management.

Here are three cost-cutting practices that should definitely be avoided:

1- Given their variable cost structure, it is quite tempting to target cost reduction in training, advertising and recruitment, but none of these areas should ever be touched when contemplating an effective budget constraint.

2- Other cost reduction plans include a so-called equal distribution of costs that may prove to be devastating in the long-run. It is simply bad business to give equal importance to departments that have unequal significance in tangible results.

3- Finally, never convert a crisis into a political debate where departments offer emergency plans to protect their own. This is simply a practice which proves to be counterproductive and will never add value to the company’s business.

Instead of committing these mistakes, make a decisive three-point action plan:

a) Determine the key value drivers that have the most important impact on the evolution of your business. Focus on long-term value, not minimal short-term costs.

For your business, the key driver may be your investment in that new, but expensive enterprise management system, which has already increased productivity by over 50%.

b) Identify the area where you are least competitive and disadvantaged in cost. This task may involve more than just a glance at your monthly bills. This may also include an exhaustive analysis of the cost structures of the competition to determine areas where your business might prove to be vulnerable.

If you noticed that your competitor invested thousands of euros in a special marketing campaign in a specific area and came up with next to nothing, don’t make the same mistake.

c) Highlight the areas that make you earn or lose money. An effective way to increase profits is also by eliminating loss of revenue, while at the same time, concentrating your efforts on major money-makers for the company.

You just can not argue with success. If a specific activity such as business consulting, accounts for over 20% of overall revenue, then you may want to double your efforts to come up with 40%. On the other hand, if that new office you opened up last year has yet to turn a profit, you might consider transferring personnel over to the business consulting division and close down in that location.

By replacing these three commonly mistaken practices, with these three productive guidelines, you might be able to revive, redirect and revamp your company’s business significantly.

This letter is stored with the following tags: cost  cost-cutting  budget  budgeting  crisis  management  strategy 
2 comments for Cut Costs, Not Business

Add a comment

Silueta
Re: Cut Costs, Not Business by Anonymous

Two campers are walking through the woods when a huge brown bear suddenly appears in the clearing about 50 feet in front of them. The bear sees the campers and begins to head toward them. The first guys drops his backpack, digs out a pair of trainers, and frantically begins to put them on. The second guys says, “What are you doing? Trainers won’t help you outrun that bear.”
“I don’t need to outrun the bear,” the first guy says. “I just need to outrun you.”
The bear is the crisis.

Silueta
Re: Cut Costs, Not Business by Anonymous

Thanks Anonymous!
Another practical overview of the crisis, this time from the Last Laugh: Click here to check it out: Subprime Crisis

Add a comment


Released under the following licence: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriv

You are free to copy, distribute and display the contents of this article but you must give credit to and mention the original author. You are not allowed to use these contents for commercial purposes, and you may not modify them to make any derivative works.

For full licence description, go to: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.1/es/deed.en

Posted on http://www.weeklyletter.com at 2008-10-07 09:00:00 +0200

Copyright (C) ITT (http://www.itt.es) and Planet Lingua (http://www.lingua.es)

We have more weekly letters by Paul

Poll for this weekly letter

Which one of the 3 proposed action items is the most effective?

Licencing

You are free to copy, distribute and display the contents of this article but you must give credit to and mention the original author. You are not allowed to use these contents for commercial purposes, and you may not modify them to make any derivative works.

Licence1

(click the above link for more information)

         terms of use           contact us
brought to you by Congenia