
That problem was solved by heraldry – the art of military symbols. Everyone can recognise a strong design and so the armies of the past identified themselves with what I suppose were proto-logos.
When recognising symbols was not a question of life or death, as in tournaments, the symbols became more intricate or even esoteric. In modern times people who understand heraldry are seen as experts. This is a bit silly really when you think that the whole purpose of heraldry was to be simple.
Many English pub names come from heraldry. When a knight and his entourage frequented a tavern they would leave their shields outside, displaying their heraldic symbols to passers-by. Thus, pubs are still called “The Rose and Crown”, “The Crown and Anchor” etcera.
Over the years as the armies became identified with the aristocracy, having a heraldic shield or a “coat of arms” was considered a sign of gentility. The same pathetic quest for vicarious respectability happens today with clothes labels such as the Lacoste alligator or Tommy Hilfigger squares.
Heraldry did not just appear in 12th century Europe. The Japanese had their monsho system and some North American tribes had their totem systems.
Some national flags are heraldic. Some are not. The French flag is just an arrangement of colours but the Union Flag (of the United Kingdom) is a heraldic cocktail of the crosses of St.George , St.Andrew and St.Patrick. The US flag is semi-heraldic as its components appear to come from the coat of arms of George Washington, the first President of the US.
Many coats of arms are accompanied by a motto. A motto is a word or phrase that, I imagine, sums up the aspirations of the those who ‘bear the arms’. My school had a coat of arms and its motto was “Fidelitor et Fortitor” (Faith and Strength). The English monarch has, ironically, a French motto – “Dieu et Mon Droit” (God and My Right).
One of my favourite mottoes is from the Sackville coat of arms. It advises “Aut nunquam tentes, aut perfice” which translates as Yoda’s advice to Luke Skywalker in “Star Wars” (Do or do not. There is no try).
Modern day heraldry is a plaything for the vain and insecure who write to the London College of Arms to see if there is a Kobayashi or Gelbfish coat of arms. For the rest of us, the original simplicity of heraldry has become the MacDonalds ‘M’ and the Nike ‘swoosh’. “O tempora! O Mores!” you might say.
Released under the following licence: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriv
You are free to copy, distribute and display the contents of this article but you must give credit to and mention the original author. You are not allowed to use these contents for commercial purposes, and you may not modify them to make any derivative works.
For full licence description, go to: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.1/es/deed.en
Posted on http://www.weeklyletter.com at 2009-04-09 00:16:00 +0200
Copyright (C) ITT (http://www.itt.es) and Planet Lingua (http://www.lingua.es)
We have more weekly letters by Domnall
Does your family have a coat of arms?
You are free to copy, distribute and display the contents of this article but you must give credit to and mention the original author. You are not allowed to use these contents for commercial purposes, and you may not modify them to make any derivative works.
(click the above link for more information)
Add a comment
Hi guys
It is true that to be recognised with any simbol is very important .Every one try to be identified with a simbol, a football team, a company, a country so that the reason to highlight this point has many consequences in the long term for users.
Could anyone imagine if Lacoste all of a sudden would decide to take the aligator off the shirts?Do you think this measure would take impact in their figures?Do you think their consumers keep buying their goods?
My point of view is simple and straight fordward and i is very dificult to be identified in a market for this, take years, decades who know, so that no company would change for nothing their motto.
Regards